Issues : Chopin's hesitations
b. 14-15
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
The compatibility of the slurring of AI and FE (here and in bars 15-16) is puzzling, as a coincidence seems to be highly unlikely. Chopin could have returned to the original slurring in the base text to FE or at the time of proofreading this edition, so the issue whether the long slur written in A is the expression of Chopin's final intention cannot be conclusively resolved. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Chopin's hesitations , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 15-16
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Chopin's hesitations |
||||||
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
Chopin changed the lowest note of the 3rd sextuplet in the R.H. twice:
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||
b. 22-23
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
The version of CDP may prove Chopin's hesitation, as far as the sound of the figures in the R.H. on the 2nd beat of each of these bars is concerned. While AI includes the final version, written without any corrections, in A, next to the final version, one can see the deleted version of CDP (in bar 23 written and deleted twice!). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Chopin's hesitations |
||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
The deletions of the 1st note on the 2nd and 4th beats of the bar, visible in A, suggest that Chopin hesitated whether to write these notes as big or small. The result of these corrections is not entirely clear (particularly on the 2nd beat); however, it seems to be more plausible that it concerned the transition to small notes, as it is in FE and EE. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Chopin's hesitations , Deletions in A |